Transforming the James River in Richmond by Ralph Hambrick: a book review




Transforming the James River in Richmond
By
Ralph Hambrick

Originally, the James River was a mode of transport, a source of food and water and provided a spirituality in the culture of our original residents, native Americans.  The colonists arrived and the river took its place in their culture, as well.  Then, through the years, as the population expanded, the river became a source of power and industry and a reservoir for sewage.   

Following the Civil War, Richmond expanded and, in its expansion piped its sewage directly into the James.  This took place for approximately 90 years until restoration rose to our consciousness due to changes in technology, and awareness of water quality and the environment.  Waterpower was being replaced by more efficient sources of power and more citizens wanted to and could recreate on the river because of more free time and a better standard of living.  As an example of the condition of the river, commercial fishing had been ruined for 40 miles downriver.  Fish had a bad smell and taste.

Ralph Hambrick has written a book documenting the journey, trials, tribulations and political upheavals in the current and continued renovation of the James in Richmond.  This not only affects Richmonders, but anyone downriver of the city.  Mr. Hambrick’s working title for his book was “From Sewer to Park”, very apt.  If you have any affinity for the James River, it’s a great story.

In 1953 design began for sewage collection and the treatment plant.  In October of 1958, the first phase of the treatment plant was opened.  It was far from sufficient; however, it was a beginning.

Prior to the 1970’s, there was virtually no public access to the river in Richmond.  Most adjacent property was privately owned and to access the river you had to trespass.  The dedication of the first section to the James River Park System occurred in October of 1970.  This was the result of much discussion (many times heated), lobbying and effort by many individuals and groups both public and private.  Access to the river by the public began to be available.

The eventual intent of their Park Plan was to provide “water, granite and dirt”.  Water was for boating, kayaking, paddle boarding, etc.  Granite was for climbing.  Dirt was for the trail system. 

The topography of the Richmond ten mile stretch of the James provides for beginner rapids, more advanced rapids, flatwater canoeing, paddle boarding, etc. and motorized boating.  Areas around the river and canals provide the “dirt” for the trail system.  The abandoned abutment for the Richmond and Petersburg railroad bridge and the quarry sites on Belle Isle provide several climbing routes for those interested.

Cleaning up the James has resulted in a resurgence of wildlife, the most well known being the bald eagle.  Birding, fishing, and wildlife photography are once again alive and well in our James thanks to these efforts.

Incorporating all of this, water quality, aesthetics, recreation and wildlife together with the development and re-development of the Richmond shoreline has been and is a huge element of this overall effort not to mention millions of dollars spent and to be spent.  A quote from Mr. Hambrick’s book:

“The restoration/construction of the downtown riverfront has been and continues to be a complex puzzle, fitting together pieces that sometimes mesh and sometimes do not.  Private property, commerce, recreation, flood protection, historic preservation, public utilities and transportation each has its constituency as well as physical presence on the ground.”

This review is just a miniscule part of the story Mr. Hambrick has documented so well.  I do hope I have been able to do some justice to the monumental efforts that have been exercised over the last 70 years to clean up “our James”.  As a downriver resident I will be eternally grateful for those efforts and future ones as they continue.  The James River holds a special place in my heart and for those of you who may feel the same, this is a story that you want to read.

Michael N. Vanatta



Comments